A few weeks ago, I wrote an article describing Arizona’s new immigration enforcement law and why most opposition to it is misled or misleading in its criticism.
Although I am in full support of every state adopting the new illegal immigration laws that Arizona enacted, I have listened to others cry racism, and that this new law is Unconstitutional. I don't claim to know everything, so I thought I would look into these claims with an objective eye.
Proponents of this law say the only people who will be questioned about their citizenship status are brown and of Latino origin.
After months of wrangling over health care, immigration is back in the political spotlight. It was only a matter of time, and both Republicans and Democrats quiver before the notion of addressing the issue. Both parties have something to lose in the immigration debate. Republicans who support amnesty and Democrats who do not will both lose votes. Both parties claim to support tougher border enforcement, but they've been pitching that line for decades now.
On the evening of November 18, 2001, Tanee Natividad, a 16 year old high school student living in the Tuscon suburb of Three Points, had a late night craving for some fast food. Hopping in a car with a friend, they headed out to grab a snack.
On the evening of November 18, 2001, Tanee Natividad, a 16 year old high school student living in the Tuscon suburb of Three Points, had a late night craving for some fast food. Hopping in a car with a friend, they headed out to grab a snack.
